2002.03.17 20:00(gmt).
Dear friends,
If you please, I need to be enlightened. Do not rush now; let us appoint rhon831 as the official spokesperson.( It will be self evident why it must be she).
A member, User Name, posted a reply which was deemed to be somewhat offensive.He exercised is limited right in doing so but was justly reprimanded by rhon831 in an extremely well-mannered way, to such a degree that one can not but clad her in a cloak of respect.
Then, lo!, the next person mobilises a bandwagon, onto which a substantial crowd jumps.Nothing wrong with that, not in itself.
But friends, is it truly necessary to do your jumping in the manner you did? Was this avalanch of insults truly the only way in which most of you could voice your displeasure?This all encompassing vitriol which eventually even swept a level -tempered lass like rhon831 with.
Why not, after rhon's posting, simply ignore, or better yet, delete the offensive posting? Surely,to call User Name's posting "worthless", himself a "twit", to "doubt his intelligence", hinting that "their attitude stinks", and stating that "you do not need millions of views from idiots who are looking to cause trouble," leaves one with the impression of hippocracy: Answering an insult with concerted insults leaves one with a sense of unease, thinking: Now who will heal the physician, if the physician is sick?
I truly admire your putting the Three Musketeers to shame, but not for the reason(s) why, nor for the way in which you did it.
Accordingly, you can delete this posting, or lock the thread, but I sincerely hope that someone will then enlighten me in person.For I voice that this will not be deleted just because you can.
Sincerely your's,
Prof.
[This message was edited by Prof on 03-17-02 at 01:01 PM.]